Connect with us

News

Kanu’s Former Lawyer Responds to Dismissal, Suggests More Details Could Emerge

Published

on

Kanu’s Former Lawyer Responds to Dismissal, Suggests More Details Could Emerge
Spread the love

By Derick Peretengboro

Former legal counsel to detained Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Nnamdi Kanu, Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor, has publicly addressed the termination of his services, indicating that further information regarding the dispute may come to light in the future.

Ejiofor’s remarks follow Kanu’s decision to end his appointment as personal lawyer through a letter dated July 22, 2026. In the letter, Kanu instructed the senior lawyer to immediately stop representing him, his family, and IPOB in any legal or public capacity.

Kanu also cautioned Ejiofor against making public statements about him or revealing confidential information obtained during their professional relationship, warning that any violation of legal ethics could result in disciplinary proceedings before the appropriate professional body.

Reacting in a statement shared on his official Facebook page, Ejiofor said he had remained silent for years despite what he described as sustained attacks, intimidation, blackmail, and attempts to damage his reputation.

According to him, numerous petitions were allegedly filed against him, while his professional integrity and legal practice were repeatedly questioned. He maintained that he deliberately chose not to respond publicly because he was guided by the ethical obligations of the legal profession.

Ejiofor further alleged that while Kanu remained in detention, threats were made against him and some supporters were encouraged to launch campaigns aimed at tarnishing his image. Despite those experiences, he insisted that he exercised restraint in line with his duties as a lawyer.

He emphasized that his silence should not be mistaken for weakness, stressing that he has consistently respected the confidentiality that exists between a lawyer and client.

The former counsel added that the time had not yet come to disclose information obtained in the course of his legal representation, noting that if he had intended to do so, he would have acted long ago.

He also questioned why concerns about attorney-client privilege were only being raised after years in which he had refrained from commenting publicly despite the alleged attacks.

Without directly addressing the authenticity of documents linked to his dismissal, Ejiofor hinted that issues surrounding the matter could eventually surface during ongoing legal proceedings involving a separate defamation case.

He concluded by stating that his silence had always been motivated by respect for the law rather than a lack of facts, adding that “time is fast running out,” a remark widely interpreted as suggesting more revelations could emerge.

The disagreement between Kanu and his former lawyer has continued to attract public attention, with many observers closely monitoring developments surrounding the high-profile legal relationship.


Spread the love
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Delta Police Arrest Five Suspects Over Viral Cult Killing In Issele-Asagba, Recover Gun

Published

on

Delta Police Arrest Five Suspects Over Viral Cult Killing In Issele-Asagba, Recover Gun
Spread the love

By staff Reporter Rukevwe Odeh

 

 

The Delta State Police Command has arrested five suspected cult members over the gruesome murder of a young man in Issele-Asagba, Aniocha North Local Government Area, following the circulation of a disturbing video of the incident on social media.

 

The victim was reportedly attacked and macheted to death during the suspected cult-related incident on October 27, 2026.

 

The arrests followed a directive by the Commissioner of Police, CP Samuel Erale, who ordered operatives of the Special Anti-Kidnapping Unit (SAKU), Asaba, to track down and apprehend those responsible.

 

According to the Police Public Relations Officer, SP Bright Edafe, intelligence-led operations resulted in the arrest of four suspected members of the Black Axe confraternity on November 3, 2026.

 

The suspects were identified as Ifechukwudi Okafor, 26; Michael Okoro, 26; Freedom Iloh, 28; and Chinasa Akwuo, 29.

 

They were apprehended during a raid on a suspected criminal hideout along Ugbolu-Amachai Road, where operatives recovered a pump-action gun, a dagger and substances suspected to be illicit drugs.

 

The police disclosed that further investigations led to the arrest of another suspect, 27-year-old Infione Solomon Omefe, on November 4.

 

Omefe reportedly confessed to participating in the killing captured in the viral video, while investigations are ongoing to apprehend other individuals allegedly connected with the crime.

 

Reacting to the development, Commissioner of Police Samuel Erale condemned the killing and assured residents that all those found culpable would face the full weight of the law.

 

He also warned individuals involved in cultism and other violent criminal activities to desist, reaffirming the command’s commitment to sustained operations against criminal groups across the state.

 

The police further urged residents to provide credible information that could assist security agencies in tackling criminal activities, assuring informants that their identities would remain confidential.

 

Meanwhile, the police said efforts were ongoing to track down other suspects believed to have participated in the killing.


Spread the love
Continue Reading

News

INEC Challenges Court Order Directing Amupitan To Produce Tinubu’s 1999–2023 Election Records

Published

on

INEC Challenges Court Order Directing Amupitan To Produce Tinubu’s 1999–2023 Election Records
Spread the love

By staff Reporter Rukevwe Odeh

 

 

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking to overturn an order directing its Chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan, to produce President Bola Tinubu’s electoral records from the 1999 Lagos State governorship election and the 2023 presidential election.

 

Amupitan, through his legal representatives, filed a Motion on Notice dated November 10, 2026, challenging the subpoena issued by the court on October 26 in the ongoing criminal trial of human rights activist and African Action Congress (AAC) presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore.

 

The case, marked FHC/CR/484/2025, is before Justice Mohammed Garba Umar and involves the Federal Republic of Nigeria as the complainant and Sowore as the defendant.

 

The subpoena directed the INEC chairman to produce two sets of electoral documents submitted by Tinubu to the commission. They include his Form CF001 for the 1999 Lagos State governorship election, alongside an affidavit relating to lost certificates, and the corresponding nomination document submitted for the 2023 presidential election.

 

The court also directed Amupitan to appear as a defence witness and remain in attendance until the determination of the case.

 

However, INEC is challenging the directive on four grounds, describing the subpoena as legally defective, improperly served and inconsistent with the relevant legal requirements.

 

The commission argued that Amupitan was not personally served with the subpoena, insisting that service on INEC’s headquarters did not satisfy the required legal procedure.

 

INEC also maintained that the documents described in the subpoena were not in its custody, arguing that there were no forms known as INEC CF01 for either the 1999 Lagos governorship election or the 2023 presidential election.

 

Furthermore, the electoral body accused the defence of bringing the application in bad faith, describing the request as irrelevant, speculative and potentially intended to embarrass the commission.

 

INEC is consequently asking the court to set aside the subpoena issued on October 26, which was reportedly served at its headquarters on November 6.

 

The development comes amid the ongoing prosecution of Sowore by the Department of State Services (DSS) over his social media description of President Tinubu as a criminal, an allegation that triggered the legal proceedings.

 

Meanwhile, the Federal High Court is expected to consider INEC’s application as the case continues, with the commission seeking to prevent its chairman from being compelled to produce the requested documents and testify.

 

The court’s decision will determine whether the subpoena remains valid and whether Amupitan will be required to appear as a witness in the proceedings.


Spread the love
Continue Reading

News

Obasanjo Reveals Why He Rejected US Political Asylum Offer Under Abacha

Published

on

Obasanjo Reveals Why He Rejected US Political Asylum Offer Under Abacha
Spread the love

By staff Reporter Rukevwe Odeh

 

 

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has revealed why he rejected an offer of political asylum from the United States despite warnings that he risked arrest upon returning to Nigeria during the military regime of the late General Sani Abacha.

 

Obasanjo disclosed this while recounting his experience under military rule in an interview published by BBC News Pidgin on Tuesday.

 

The former president said the American ambassador to Nigeria contacted him while he was travelling abroad and informed him that the US government was prepared to grant him political asylum because of intelligence reports indicating that Abacha intended to arrest him if he returned home.

 

However, Obasanjo said he declined the offer because he believed he had committed no offence that warranted seeking refuge outside his country.

 

He recalled that after retiring from the Nigerian Army at the age of 42 as a four-star general and former military Head of State, he ventured into agriculture, which was progressing successfully before the Abacha administration moved against him.

 

According to him, he considered his military career complete after attaining the highest rank in the Army and serving as Nigeria’s military leader between 1976 and 1979.

 

Obasanjo alleged that Abacha had decided he must be eliminated to prevent him from standing in the way of the military ruler’s plans.

 

He said upon returning to Nigeria, his international passport was seized, after which he proceeded to his farm.

 

On arriving at the farm, one of his security personnel informed him that government security operatives had surrounded the property.

 

He further narrated that a police officer dressed in civilian clothes subsequently approached him, claiming that an Assistant Inspector-General of Police (AIG) had invited him to the station.

 

Obasanjo said he challenged the officer, insisting that if the AIG wanted to see him, he should come personally rather than send someone to invite him.

 

He eventually drove himself to the police station, where the AIG informed him that he had received instructions to arrest him.

 

The former president also recalled the intervention of former United States President Jimmy Carter, who appealed to Abacha on his behalf.

 

According to Obasanjo, Carter’s intervention initially secured his placement under house arrest after he had been held at an undisclosed location.

 

However, he said security operatives later arrived at about 1am while he was playing squash and took him away to prison.

 

Obasanjo was arrested in 1995 over allegations of involvement in a coup plot against Abacha’s government. He was tried by a military tribunal and sentenced to life imprisonment, although the sentence was later reduced to 15 years.

 

He regained his freedom in June 1998 following Abacha’s death and subsequently won the 1999 presidential election, becoming Nigeria’s civilian president.

 

He served two terms in office, leaving the presidency in May 2007.


Spread the love
Continue Reading

Trending