Justice
Appeal Court Dismisses Suit Against Warri Delineation, Clears INEC to Proceed
By Divine Perezide
The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja has dismissed an appeal seeking to halt the implementation of the Supreme Court-ordered delineation of electoral wards and polling units in the Warri Federal Constituency of Delta State.
Follow us on our Whatsapp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbCMTx76WaKnywmgKi3K
The appellate court, in a unanimous judgment delivered on Friday, May 15, 2026, held that the appeal lacked merit and affirmed the earlier ruling of the Federal High Court, Abuja.
The appeal, marked CA/ABJ/CV/1457/2025, was filed by Hon. Appearance Afejuku, identified as Youth President of the Itsekiri Ethnic Nationality, alongside three others against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and other respondents.
A three-member panel led by Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam upheld the July 1, 2025 judgment of Justice Omotosho of the Federal High Court, which dismissed the suit challenging INEC’s implementation of the Supreme Court judgment in suit number SC/413/2016: Hon. George U. Timinimi & 9 Ors v. INEC.
The lower court had described the suit as an abuse of court process and awarded a cost of ₦4 million against the plaintiffs.
In its ruling, the Court of Appeal maintained that the issue surrounding the delineation exercise in Warri Federal Constituency had already been conclusively settled by the Supreme Court and could not be reopened through fresh litigation.
The judgment is widely seen as a major legal victory for INEC and supporters of the delineation exercise, as it effectively clears the electoral body to proceed with the fresh ward and polling unit delineation ahead of future elections in the area.
Meanwhile, in a related development, the Federal High Court sitting in Warri also dismissed suit number FHC/WR/CS/37/2025 filed by Ejeyi Philip and others seeking to nullify INEC’s interim report on the fresh delineation released on May 3, 2025.
The plaintiffs had argued that the Itsekiri people were not adequately consulted before the exercise was carried out.
However, the court held that the Supreme Court judgment did not mandate INEC to conduct consultations with the Itsekiri ethnic nationality before implementing the delineation exercise.
The court further ruled that the suit was premature since the interim report issued by INEC remained a proposal subject to further administrative processes.
The latest judicial pronouncements are expected to shape the political landscape within the Warri Federal Constituency, where the delineation exercise has generated intense political and ethnic debates among stakeholders.
Justice
Appeal Court Reconvenes to Hear ADC, Four Other Parties’ Challenge Against Deregistration
By Rukevwe Odeh
The Court of Appeal in Abuja is scheduled to continue proceedings in the legal dispute over the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and four other political parties.
The appeal follows a Federal High Court judgment that ordered the deregistration of the affected parties, a decision they have challenged at the appellate court. Alongside the ADC, the Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party, Action Peoples Party (APP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP) are asking the court to overturn the ruling.
At an earlier sitting, the three-member panel, led by Justice Abba Mohammed, postponed the substantive hearing to allow all parties involved to complete the filing and exchange of legal documents. The court fixed July 7 for the full hearing after lawyers requested additional time to regularise their processes.
The legal battle stems from a lower court judgment that directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to withdraw recognition from the five political parties. However, the Court of Appeal had previously ordered that the status quo be maintained pending the determination of the appeals, effectively putting the deregistration on hold.
The affected parties argue that the Federal High Court erred in both law and procedure, insisting that the ruling should be set aside. They maintain that the judgment threatens political pluralism and could unfairly limit participation in the country’s democratic process.
INEC has also expressed support for maintaining the existing situation until the appeal is resolved, noting that the substantive issues raised by the parties deserve judicial consideration before any final action is taken.
The outcome of the appeal is expected to have significant implications for the political parties involved as preparations continue for the 2027 general elections.
Justice
Peter Obi Sues Kenneth Okonkwo, Demands ₦8 Billion Over Bribery Allegations
By Divine Perezide
Presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has taken legal action against his former associate, Kenneth Okonkwo, over allegations of bribery and corruption.
Obi is seeking ₦8 billion in damages, accusing Okonkwo of making defamatory statements that portrayed him as being involved in collecting illegal payments from political aspirants.
The dispute stems from comments allegedly made by Okonkwo during a television interview, where he claimed that Obi and some South-East political figures demanded additional payments of ₦10 million from individuals seeking House of Representatives tickets under the party, despite having already paid official nomination fees.
According to Obi’s legal team, the remarks were false, damaging, and capable of harming his public image and political reputation. They argue that the statements suggested involvement in fraud, extortion, and other criminal conduct.
The lawyers further stated that the allegations were widely circulated across media platforms and social media, increasing their potential reputational damage.
As part of the suit, Obi is requesting a court order compelling Okonkwo to retract the claims publicly, issue an unreserved apology across all his media platforms, and provide an undertaking not to repeat such statements in the future.
He is also demanding financial compensation of ₦8 billion for the alleged harm caused.
The case marks a major escalation in the strained relationship between the two, who were once political allies but have since fallen out over party-related disagreements.
Justice
Lawyer Urges Court to Withdraw Bench Warrant Against Sowore Over Constitutional Concerns
By Rukevwe odeh
Human rights lawyer Aloy Ejimakor has urged Justice Mohammed Umar of the Federal High Court in Abuja to withdraw the bench warrant issued against African Action Congress (AAC) presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore.
Ejimakor argued that the order should be set aside on constitutional grounds, insisting that it raises concerns about the protection of fundamental rights and due process.
The request comes amid ongoing legal proceedings involving Sowore before the court, where issues surrounding his presence in court and previous judicial orders have been under contention.
-
Breaking2 months ago2027: INEC Alegedly Announces Plans to Conduct Party Primaries in the Newly Created State Constituencies in Warri North and Warri Southwest LGAs, Others
-
Local News2 months agoJust In: Ambassador Podoki Emerges APP Candidate for Burutu Constituency-I Assembly Seat
-
Politics2 months ago2027: Mulade Challenges NDC’s Substitution of His Party Candidacy, Demands ₦5 Billion Damages
-
Breaking2 months agoTinubu Intervenes in Warri Delineation Dispute, Meets Ijaw, Urhobo and Itsekiri Leaders
-
Local News3 months agoINC: Group Faults Sponsored Attacks on Tompolo, Igbadiwei, Urges Unity in Ijaw Nation
-
Breaking2 months agoConfirmed: INEC Announces Implementation of Warri Delineation Report, Restores Other Constinuencies
-
Entertainment3 weeks agoJKing Logistics Coordinator Shed Light to Address Ijaw Music Wage Controversy
-
News2 months agoArogbo Kingdom Petitions EFCC Over Abandoned NDDC Bridge Project